September 12, 2026
Spot capacity is the cheapest compute in the cloud and the only compute sold without an uptime promise. That saves real money, up to 90 percent off on-demand rates, and it changes what you can ever claim back from your provider. Before you move more of the fleet onto spare capacity, it pays to know exactly where AWS, Azure, and Google stand on paper, what a reclaim looks like in practice, and whether the discount is worth more than the credit it replaces. It almost always is, and the numbers below show why.

There is no ambiguity hiding in the contracts. Microsoft's docs say it outright: "there's no SLA for these VMs." Google's is just as explicit: "Spot VMs are not covered by any Service Level Agreement and are excluded from the Compute Engine SLA." AWS publishes nothing that dramatic, but the pieces line up the same way: spot instances run "whenever capacity is available," get reclaimed when "Amazon EC2 needs the capacity back," and the compute SLA's credit process has no procedure for a reclaim.
| Provider | Spot product | Listed discount | Reclaim warning | What the SLA says |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AWS | Spot Instances | up to 90% off On-Demand | 2-minute interruption notice, plus earlier rebalance recommendations | Interruptions are documented behavior; the credit process covers outages, not reclaims |
| Azure | Spot VMs | up to 90% cheaper than pay-as-you-go | minimum 30 seconds before eviction | "No SLA for these VMs" |
| Google Cloud | Spot VMs | up to 91% off | metadata signal, 0 or 120 seconds notice, shutdown period up to 30 seconds | "Excluded from the Compute Engine SLA" |
| DigitalOcean | none | not offered | not applicable | No spot tier exists, so Droplets keep their standard coverage |
For a workload built for it, an interruption is boring: the instance drains, the queue picks the job up somewhere else, nobody notices. For a workload that is not built for it, the same event is a page at 3am and a half-finished job. The mechanics differ by provider, and the differences matter if you are writing handlers.
AWS issues a two-minute interruption notice as an EventBridge event and in instance metadata, and recommends checking every five seconds. Delivery is best effort, and rebalance recommendations often arrive earlier when an instance is at higher risk. Azure gives a minimum of 30 seconds before an eviction, through opt-in Scheduled Events, also best effort. Google signals preemption through instance metadata, with a notice duration you choose at creation: 0 seconds by default, 120 seconds if your workload needs the runway. None of these promise that you will finish your work.
The billing rules are friendlier than most people assume:
A reclaim is not an outage. It is the product working as documented, and you were paid for it up front, in the discount. The only questions that matter are whether the discount outweighs the disruption and whether the workload can absorb it.
Put real numbers on it. Take a $10,000 monthly compute bill, move a share onto spot at a 70 percent average discount (the ceilings in the table are higher, but averages are what show up on invoices), and compare the monthly saving against the credit you could claim if things went badly.
| Compute mix | Monthly bill | Monthly saving | Credit at a 10 percent tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| All on-demand | $10,000 | n/a | $1,000 |
| Half on spot | $6,500 | $3,500 | $650 |
| 80% on spot | $4,400 | $5,600 | $440 |
Every SLA in play calculates credits as a percentage of what you actually paid for the affected service, so a smaller bill means smaller credits. In the 80 percent mix, one month of spot savings ($5,600) is worth roughly 13 months of a possible credit ($440), and that credit only arrives after a region-level failure, a claim, and a filing before the deadline. The savings land every month regardless. That asymmetry is the whole decision.
One extra detail for AWS accounts holding a Compute Savings Plan: spot spend does not apply toward the commitments, so a fleet that leans too far onto spot can leave a shortfall behind it. Balance the mix with that in mind.
Spot is a trade, and it is only fair when you decide, workload by workload, who can lose an instance mid-run. Batch jobs, queue workers, CI runners, and stateless services behind a load balancer are spot material. Databases, single-instance stateful services, and anything your own contracts promise at a specific uptime stay on on-demand or reserved capacity. That group is your covered core: your uptime floor, and the spend any future credit calculation draws on.
It is smaller than most teams assume, too. AWS measures instance-level unavailability as loss of external connectivity and automatically waives the charge for any single instance unavailable more than six minutes in a clock hour, no claim required. That kind of detail is the difference between an SLA you can use and an SLA you only quote.
Then watch the supply side of the trade. Azure publishes per-SKU eviction rates for the last 28 days through Resource Graph, Google's managed instance groups can pick machine types with the lowest observed preemption rates, and AWS rebalance recommendations are the early warning that a pool is heating up.
Handlers first. Every provider gives you a signal, and all of them treat delivery as best effort, so build as if the notice might not arrive:
Then spread the risk across instance types and zones, so a single hot pool cannot take the whole fleet at once, and checkpoint on a schedule rather than only when a signal arrives. Spot capacity is finite and shared, and the moments you most want it are the moments everyone else wants it too. The handlers are best effort; your job progress should not be.
Open last month's compute bill and split it into two columns: workloads that can lose an instance mid-run, and workloads that cannot. Move the first column to spot, keep the second on capacity that carries a promise, and run the arithmetic above against your own bill. That covered core is the only part of your infrastructure that ever converts a provider failure into money back, and it is the part uptimeaudit.io monitors and, when a breach crosses a threshold, drafts the claim for. The discount pays out every month. The credit, if it ever arrives, arrives once and after a fight. Price both accordingly.